Search
Home
Healthcare
Education
Environment
Economics
Foreign Policy
About
Contact
Search
Afghanistan Strategy, Mar. 2009
Posted by
benarmstrong
on
3/28/2009 5:26:11 PM
.
This policy was first proposed by
President Barack Obama, The White House
.
Level of Government:
National
Status:
Implemented
Abstract
Background:
The War in Afghanistan has ascended to the top of the United States’ list of foreign policy priorities. Shortly after his inauguration, and in response to escalated violence in 2008, President Obama ordered for a 17,000 soldier increase in American troops. Recent reports indicate that the Taliban is planning a renewed offensive once the additional American troops report for duty. Sources also report that Taliban constituencies in Afghanistan and Pakistan have decided to ally against western interests in Afghanistan. In his March 27, 2009 speech, President Obama outlined a more focused US strategy to protect American security interests in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Purpose:
Obama clearly stated that the United States’ military purpose in Afghanistan and – by proxy – Pakistan is to “disrupt, dismantle and defeat” al Qaeda and the Taliban in both countries. Specifically, the United States will direct its efforts in order to prevent al Qaeda from planning future international attacks and preclude the Taliban from recapturing control of the national government.
Plans:
The United States military will increase the number of troops training Afghan forces. US training operations will seek to prepare a 82,000-strong Afghan police force and a 134,000-strong Afghan military. The US Dept. of Defense will further cooperate with Pakistan’s military and intelligence bureaus, particularly Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI). President Obama seeks for the United States to provide direct aid to suffering Pakistanis through infrastructure projects and humanitarian assistance. Diplomatically, the US will promote open communications between Afghanistan and Pakistan and facilitate reconciliation at the provincial level.
Resources:
President Obama did not give specific estimates of the policy’s total costs; see reports for various estimates of the ultimate cost. The plan expresses support for a 5-year, $8.5 Billion
aid package to Pakistan.
Policy Details
National Security
The explicit purpose of the comprehensive strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan is to ward off terrorist threats from the region. "For the American people," President Obama declared, "the border region [between Afghanistan and Pakistan] is the most dangerous place in the world." Obama believes that al Qaeda is plotting another international attack from the border region. In order to prevent the threat from materializing, U.S. policy must focus on securing and stabilizing Afghanistan. National security interests provide the rational foundation for President Obama's decision to invest further military and diplomatic resources in the Afghan operation.
Middle East
Afghanistan's central location links its fate to numerous other states in the Middle East and Asia. Iran and Pakistan have explicit interests in the stabilization of Afghanistan. Obama's new strategy will focus specifically on engaging Pakistan and its intelligence resources to fight Taliban insurgents that have a base in western Pakistan. It also pledges to facilitate frequent regional meetings including Pakistan and Afghanistan. An upcoming conference on the future of Afghanistan will include NATO members and Iran, among others.
Armed Forces
Subsequent to the initial increase of American forces in Afghanistan by 17,000, the new strategy further increases American trainers by 4,000.
Afghanistan
Obama's strategy will send 4,000 U.S. forces to train the Afghan military and police. The goal is to prepare 134,000 Afghan military personnel and 82,000 police personnel to secure the country. Training Afghan forces will insure that the Afghan government will be capable of providing for its own security once American and NATO troops withdraw.
In order to combat corruption, US political officials will promote a new political compact that commits Afghan pols to honest governance. US political teams will also work to foster regional reconciliation, particularly in zones where the Taliban was formerly prominent.
Pakistan
The strategy offers both general and border-specific prescriptions for Pakistan. Generally, it endorses a bill offering $1.5 Billion in direct infrastructural and humanitarian aid to Pakistanis in each of the next five years. While Obama seeks a close military and intelligence partnership with the Pakistanis, he makes it clear that US policy is independent and provides "no blank check."
Specifically, he argues that the US will act to eliminate threats in the border region, "one way or another." Obama pledges to continue training Pakistani military forces to secure the border and endorses legislation that would help build opportunity zones along the border region.
Diplomacy
The number of American civilian officers in Afghanistan will increase, particularly in the foreign service. The goal is to strengthen non-military institutions, particularly those that form the foundation for democratic governance. The specifics of these efforts will be determined later.
The strategy also commits to facilitate a stronger tri-partite dialogue with the US, India and Pakistan.
Related Links
Obama Speech Outlining Afghanistan Strategy (CFR)
:
The transcript of Obama's March 27, 2009 speech explicates how US policy in Afghanistan will transform in the coming months and years.
News of Afghanistan Strategy and Context (NYT)
:
The New York Times provides context and explanation for the various new elements of the Obama admininstration's Afghanistan strategy.
Perspectives on Diplomacy with the Taliban (CFR)
:
Several CFR experts offer opinions on the prospect of diplomatic negotiation with the Taliban.
Expert Comments on Afghan/Pakistan Security Policy (CFR)
:
CFR Fellow Stephen Biddle provides context and insight on the military intricacies surrounding President Obama's recent plan to escalate the United States involvement in Afghanistan and the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.
Context for Afghanistan
:
A specific outline of the Afghan government's endemic corruption demonstrates the context in which the current American policy will be implemented. It raises the question whether a strong national government can flourish in Afghanistan.
Related Articles on Pi
Tiptoeing through the Imperial Graveyard: Background and a Proposal for Afghanistan
: by
benarmstrong
on
4/4/2009 10:34:40 AM
Abstract:
The United States’ 2001 intervention in Afghanistan inaugurated the American “War on Terror.” The military incursion sought to cripple the United States’ enemies, eliminating the threat that al Qaeda’s terrorism posed to the American homeland and its interests abroad. Security, however, was not the only goal. The Bush administration, upon defeating al Qaeda, aimed to aid and defend the long-oppressed Afghan population, the first step in a greater moral mission to spread democracy and “end tyranny in our world." The reasoning behind the Afghan invasion blended security and ideological imperatives to form an entirely new category of foreign policy project.
Coming Soon
Re-imagining Community Colleges (CAP)
in
Education
by
Center for American Progress
Login
Username:
Password:
Remember me
Create new account
I forgot my password
The following policies address similar issues:
Bush National Security Strategy
proposed by
George W. Bush Administration
Iraq War Withdrawal Plan
proposed by
White House, President Barack Obama
"Up, Up and Out," a New Defense Strategy
proposed by
Paul Kane, Marine Veteran
A National Strategy for Global Development
proposed by
Reuben Brigety and Sabina Dewan, Center for American Progress
Strategic Planning Interagency Group (SPIAG)
proposed by
Bruce Jentleson, Duke University
The Foreign Assistance Revitalization and Accountability Act (Senate Foreign Aid Reform Bill)
proposed by
Sens. Kerry, Lugar, Menendez, Corker, Risch and Cardin, U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Comprehensive Effort to Advance Pakistani Civilian Government
proposed by
Center for American Progress
Smart Power
proposed by
Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State
Thinking Big on Nuclear Non-Proliferation
proposed by
Brookings Institution, Carlos Pascual and Steven Pifer
US Defense Policy Survey
proposed by
Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Obama Administration
Afghanistan Strategy, Mar. 2009
proposed by
President Barack Obama, The White House