I realize that politics prevents any intergovernmental treaty from mandating a process by which emissions reduction can be achieved.  The economic systems and sociocultural realities within each state shape how that state will confront climate change policy.  Some countries will obviously be capable of moving faster than others (either through ideological consensus or economic palatability).  However, every country in the EU should duly note and seek to understand what projects and policies have worked (and failed) for their neighbors.

Thus, though I believe that binding targets are constructive in setting the agenda (i.e. forcing action), they are not sufficient international action in themselves.  International discussions on climate change should include a list of best practices and trusted federal projects to reduce emissions and foster a cleaner planet.  Now that the EU has set targets (which I find to be progressive and necessary), it should engage in an international dialogue that centers on what works and what does not.  Without the threat of mandates or the goal of treaty, countries meeting in Brussels should look to one another with respect for experience and openness toward experimentation.  Effective climate policy will require innovative and collaborative action at all levels of government.  Intergovernmental discussions must extend beyond where to set the cap and begin to address how best to reduce emissions below the cap.